Why is the Chinese president "forcing" the representatives of African states to sign that agreement?
Because China is the role model for the global social scoring and total surveillance.
Cop15: historic deal struck to halt biodiversity loss by 2030
Patrick Greenfield and Phoebe Weston in Montreal, Mon 19 Dec 2022 10.46 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/19/cop15-historic-deal-signed-to-halt-biodiversity-loss-by-2030-aoe
" Governments appear to have signed a once-in-a-decade deal to halt the destruction of Earth’s ecosystems, but the agreement seems to have been forced through by the Chinese president, ignoring the objections of some African states.
After more than four years of negotiations, repeated delays due to the Covid-19 pandemic and talks into the night on Sunday in Montreal, nearly 200 countries – but not the US or the Vatican – signed an agreement at the biodiversity Cop15, which was co-hosted by Canada and China, to put humanity on a path to living in harmony with nature by the middle of the century. "
By 2030: Protect 30% of Earth’s lands, oceans, coastal areas, inland waters; Reduce by $500 billion annual harmful government subsidies; Cut food waste in half
Official CBD Press Release - 19 December 2022, Montreal
https://www.cbd.int/article/cop15-cbd-press-release-final-19dec2022
" Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework: 23 targets
TARGET 1
Ensure that all areas are under participatory integrated biodiversity inclusive spatial planning and/or effective management processes addressing land and sea use change, to bring the loss of areas of high biodiversity importance, including ecosystems of high ecological integrity, close to zero by 2030, while respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities.
TARGET 2
Ensure that by 2030 at least 30 per cent of areas of degraded terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine ecosystems are under effective restoration, in order to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, ecological integrity and connectivity.
TARGET 3
Ensure and enable that by 2030 at least 30 per cent of terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, are effectively conserved and managed through ecologically representative, well-connected and equitably governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, recognizing indigenous and traditional territories, where applicable, and integrated into wider landscapes, seascapes and the ocean, while ensuring that any sustainable use, where appropriate in such areas, is fully consistent with conservation outcomes, recognizing and respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities including over their traditional territories."
Look where WWF & Greenpeace operate and what comes next.
They always force native people to leave an area by pretending to protect the animals and after that the big corporations come to frack oil & gas or for industrial farming or just fun tourism for the oligarch clans.For example look to the Inuit. They were expelled from their hunting grounds. Now the oil firms produce there. The only thing the people got is cancer, which they never had before.
This is part of a bigger documentary of German television. The title is: "Sensation: The Inuit in the Arctic reject Greenpeace!"
Sensationell: Inuit in Arktis lehnt @GREENPEACE ab !! @greenpeace_de
Jan 7, 2016
In former times that was colonialism and imperialism, today the pretext is "eviction from national parks".
Government U-turn halts tribal eviction from India’s national parks
May 16, 2011
https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/7278
"The withdrawn policy had assumed that people would have to be removed from ‘critical wildlife habitats’. An estimated 100,000 people have already become conservation refugees following eviction from conservation areas in India. These refugees lose access to the lands and resources they have relied on for generations, and often have sacred sites and burial grounds from which they are barred, with terrible impacts on their mental and physical health."
Karen People forcibly expelled from the Kaeng Krachan National Park in Thailand
Posted on Jan 31, 2012
http://justconservation.org/karen-people-forcibly-expelled-from-the-kaeng-krachan-national-park-in-thailand
"According to sources that have visited Kaeng Krachan National Park and collected information, the harassment of Karen villagers has been going on for some time and became severe in May, June and July 2011, when many of the villagers’ houses and rice stores were burned and money, jewellery, fishing and agricultural tools were stolen by a group comprising National Park wardens and military forces. As a result, some of these villagers moved away and are now staying with relatives elsewhere and a number of them (allegedly around 70 people) are hiding in the forest in fear of meeting government officers, and are without sufficient food and shelter."
Evicted fight back against nature parks
Rory Carroll in Johannesburg, Tue 9 Sep 2003 02.29 BST https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/sep/09/southafrica.conservationandendangeredspecies
"Pygmies, Bedouins and Bushmen, among others, said they would no longer accept being brushed aside by governments and environmentalists in the name of protecting world heritage sites.
Communities which feel betrayed by the conservation movement have mobilised to turn the 10-day world parks congress which opened in Durban yesterday into a platform for their grievances."
Thousands of Tanzania’s Maasai evicted from their land ‘for tourism’
By Rodney Muhumuza. Updated May 12, 2018 — 12.19pmfirst published at 12.13pm https://www.smh.com.au/world/africa/thousands-of-tanzania-s-maasai-evicted-from-their-land-for-tourism-20180511-p4zert.html
"Villagers in northern Tanzania's Loliondo area, near the Ngorongoro Crater tourism hotspot, have been evicted in the past year and denied access to vital grazing and watering holes, said the new report by the Oakland Institute, a California think-tank that researches environmental and social issues."
Democratic Republic of the Congo: The Batwa and their Return to Ancestral Lands in the Kahuzi Biega National Park
Posted on May 14, 2020. Included in Bulletin 249
https://wrm.org.uy/articles-from-the-wrm-bulletin/section1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo-the-batwa-and-their-return-to-ancestral-lands-in-the-kahuzi-biega-national-park/
"A group of riparian Batwa people, exasperated by the extreme poverty following their eviction in order to establish the Kahuzi Biega National Park, decided to return to their ancestral forests. Since then, they regularly clash with the “eco-guards,” sometimes leading to the loss of human lives."
Threat of death penalty for ecoguards who killed indigenous men in DRC national park
21 December, 2020
https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/death-penalty-ecoguards-who-killed-batwa-DRC-kahuzi-biega
"A Congolese court in is on the point of awarding damages to the families of two indigenous Batwa men who were killed by Kahuzi Biega National Park (PNKB) ecoguards in 2019. The five ecoguards, who have already confessed to killing the men concerned, might well be found guilty of homicide: the verdict is being deliberated on by the court in Bukavu, Eastern DRC right now. However, whilst we fully support the verdict of guilty, we were hugely concerned to learn that the prosecutor in the case is demanding the death penalty for two of the five ecoguards."
"The situation around PNKB is increasingly tense. Batwa communities, dispossessed in the 1970s to make way for the national park, have been struggling ever since then. In the first place, the struggle has been simply to survive, as their expulsion has forced them to become squatters or bonded labourers on other people’s land and they have few, if any, sources of livelihood. Secondly, their struggle has been to be recognised as having experienced a historical injustice and as people who can and should care for their ancestral lands.
In recent years, the false dichotomy between conservation, represented by the PNKB management, and the communities who used to live in the lands now occupied by the park, has resulted in violent exchanges, including these deaths. The tit-for-tat of accusations, attacks and reprisals is overshadowing the underlying problem – that Batwa communities were displaced from their ancestral lands without consent and without compensation – and the obvious solution – which is to secure Batwa customary land rights so that they can be sustained by and sustain their lands."
It is named “protection” but the result is always controlled exploitation. WWF “gives” certificate for deforestation as if it was owning the forest.
FOREST CERTIFICATION (website has been removed by WWF)
http://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/forest_sector_transformation2/forest_certification/
Moving to a“forests forward” market. WWF’s new impact-oriented platform engages companies, investors and other stakeholders to accelerate global sustainability commitments.
10 June 2021
https://www.wwfca.org/en/?367335/Moving-to-aforests-forward-market-WWFs-new-impact-oriented-platform-engages-companies-investors-and-other-stakeholders-to-accelerate-global-sustainability-commitments
"Global demand for land, energy, and wood products is increasing while deforestation and forest degradation continue at an alarming rate. Meeting this growing demand while keeping forests intact requires bold solutions. Companies and investors worldwide are in a unique position to enable innovative approaches that conserve and enhance the benefits of biodiversity-rich, productive forest landscapes while meeting some of the biggest challenges of our time: climate change, water and food security and sustainable livelihoods.
WWF’s new Forests Forward platform aims to improve the management of 150 million hectares of forest by 2030, providing opportunities to create meaningful impact in landscapes and facilitating reporting on these impacts. It has a strong emphasis on indigenous people and local communities, which play a critical role in forest conservation with local models of governance that can help protect forests, often better than many other forms of forest stewardship."
FOREST CERTIFICATION
Quote taken at 23.12.2022
https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/forests_practice/forest_sector_transformation_updated/forest_certification/
"Forest certification is a mechanism for forest monitoring, tracing and labeling timber, wood and pulp products and non-timber forest products, where the quality of forest management is judged against a series of agreed standards.
Credible forest certification covers much more than just logging practices – it also accounts for the social and economic well-being of workers and local communities, transparency and inclusiveness in decision making.
Responsible forest management is a key component of WWF’s vision for a future in which people live in harmony with nature. The sustainable use of renewable forest products can help provide forest-dependent people with shelter, fuel, medicine and other services, while providing essential habits for plants and animals and safeguard against climate change.
Forest certification is an important tool to promote better forest management and trade of forest products. However, certification is not a universal remedy against all the threats facing forests globally - it cannot replace scientifically sound regulations and legislation and must be complemented by strategies to protect and restore forests.
What certification system can you trust? Today there are a plethora of forest certification schemes. Certification will only ensure responsible forest management if the system has comprehensive management standards, rigorous control mechanisms and broad involvement of economic, environmental and social stakeholders. To be credible, schemes should have strong verification systems. A scheme largely based on legal rules, procedures and enforcement may be valid in countries with strong and functioning law enforcement, but could potentially be damaging in countries where this is not the case.
WWF considers the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) to be the most robust certification system to ensure environmentally responsible, socially beneficial and economically viable management of forests. WWF therefore recommends the FSC system to consumers, companies purchasing forest products, forest managers, policymakers and businesses."
Implementing Sustainable Forest Management Through Kuba’an-Puak Corridor Project (website has been removed by WWF)
https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/deforestation_fronts/deforestation_in_borneo_and_sumatra/
The final statement of the same friend: "Evil organisation puppets once again!! Thank you for that information."
Displacement and discrimination – the Bambuti Pygmies
November 2010
https://www.fmreview.org/DRCongo/displacement%26discrimination.htm
"For generations the Bamputi Pygmies were nomadic forest-dwellers but in 2004 they too fled the war. Now they live on the outskirts of Goma with little if any support from humanitarian agencies. They have no electricity or running water; straw-covered roofs on makeshift shelters provide poor protection from the frequent rain.
“We can’t plant seeds here,” said Bambuti chief Mupepa Muhindo, scratching the ground, which is littered with lava. “It's not possible to cultivate the land.”
Life is hard for all IDPs but even worse for the Bambuti, whose lives are blighted by violence and daily discrimination. Discrimination against Pygmies is deeply ingrained at all levels of Congolese society. They have great difficulty accessing any kind of public or social service, and are routinely turned away. Such attitudes mean parents rarely register new births so total population numbers are unclear but it is estimated that there are about 30,000 in North Kivu and 200-500,000 in DRC as a whole.”
Tribal communities suffer when evicted in the name of conservation
By Abhijit Mohanty Last Updated: Friday 10 May 2019
https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/forests/tribal-communities-suffer-when-evicted-in-the-name-of-conservation-64376
"The tribal communities are paying a brutal price for governments' agenda to boost safari, create protected areas and attract tourism"
Having about 200 states signed the biodiversity agreement, they have now to begin with ratification into national law ans beginning to evict the people from most areas of their countries. Hopefully this will result in the eviction of all the politicians who are responsible for this submission act under a Eugnicist global crime gang.
The so called NGOs are NWOs social engineering agencies!
Greenpeace WWF etc. are lobby-troyans of Colonialism, Fascism, Corporatism!
https://geoarchitektur.blogspot.com/p/greenpeace-wwf-co-are-trojans-of-global.html
Define globalism and all globalists as the enemy! The killers of Magufuli and other resisters are eugenicists, Gates, WHO, WEF, Greenpeace & Co.
https://geoarchitektur.blogspot.com/p/define-globalism-and-all-globalists-as.html
Dose of terror, abusing solidarity spirit for climate agreement!
https://geoarchitektur.blogspot.com/p/terror-for-climate-terror-furs-klima.html
COP15: Betretungsverbot in Namen des Naturschutzes?
https://www.konjunktion.info/2022/12/cop15-betretungsverbot-in-namen-des-naturschutzes/
License of Enkidu Gilgamesh - Sharing is Caring!
No comments:
Post a Comment