This report was produced by
The Rockefeller Foundation
and Global Business Network.
May 2010
Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet.
They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure. Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world!"
- Kill and sterilize the young and healthy!
- Break the global supply chains!
- Destroy the global economy!
- Prohibit international mobility!
- End all individual traveling!
- mandatory wearing of face masks to
- body-temperature checks
- restrictions to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets,
- more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities,
- firmer grip on power,
- biometric IDs for all citizens,
- tighter regulation of key industries,
- government outlawed high- emitting vehicles,
- irresponsible elites increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens,
- monopolistic companies made significant advances.
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high- emitting vehicles.
This part is more about what the globalists don't want. They would like to prevent resistance of national states against global government.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them.
– GK Bhat, TARU Leading Edge, India
It would be good for the developing countries to ditch all European and US-American influence and strangulating IP regulations.
One of the main targets of the US-imperialists is to breakdown Nigeria in smaller pieces after instigating civil unrest and civil war. That is the reason, this country is named here. However, this motive is used to show how the "good willing" of "lock step" could be tarnished by uprising against the global governance.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
THE 17 GOALS
https://sdgs.un.org/goals
HEADLINES IN LOCK STEP
2010 - 2030
- Quarantine Restricts In-Person Contact; Cellular Networks Overloaded (2013)
- Italy Addresses 'Immigrant Caregiver' Gap with Robots (2017)
- Intercontinental Trade Hit by Strict Pathogen Controls (2015)
- Vietnam to Require ‘A Solar Panel on Every Home’ (2022)
- Will Africa’s Embrace of Authoritarian Capitalism a la China Continue? (2018)
- Proliferating Trade Networks in Eastern and Southern Africa Strengthen Regional Ties (2023)
- African Leaders Fear Repeat of Nigeria's 2026 Government Collapse (2028)
Philanthropic organizations will face hard choices in this world. Given the strong role of governments, doing philanthropy will require heightened diplomacy skills and the ability to operate effectively in extremely divergent environments. Philanthropy grantee and civil society relationships will be strongly moderated by government, and some foundations might choose to align themselves more closely with national official development assistance (ODA) strategies and government objectives.
Larger philanthropies will retain an outsized share of influence, and many smaller philanthropies may find value in merging financial, human, and operational resources. Philanthropic organizations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms will get blocked at many nations’ borders. Developing smart, flexible, and wide-ranging relationships in this world will be key; some philanthropies may choose to work only in places where their skills and services don’t meet resistance. Many governments will place severe restrictions on the program areas and geographies that international philanthropies can work in, leading to a narrower and stronger geographic focus or grant-making in their home country only.
Thus for each scenario we offer a sense of the context for technological innovation, taking into consideration the pace, geography, and key creators. We also suggest a few technology trends and applications that could flourish in each scenario.
Technological innovation in “Lock Step” is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance, large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.
• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.
• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lower- bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.
• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls.
Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
India Once Released 25,000 Flesh-Eating Turtles Into the Ganges
A plan to clean up corpses failed due to lack of planning
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/indias-government-once-released-25000-flesh-eating-turtles-ganges-river-180953384/
Manisha gazed out on the Ganges River, mesmerized by what she saw. Back in 2010, when she was 12 years old, her parents had brought her to this river so that she could bathe in its holy waters. But standing at the edge, Manisha had been afraid. It wasn’t the depth of the river or its currents that had scared her, but the water itself:
it was murky and brown and smelled pungently of trash and dead things. Manisha had balked, but her mother had pushed her forward, shouting that this river flowed from the lotus feet of Vishnu and she should be honored to enter it. Along with millions of Hindus, her mother believed the Ganges’s water could cleanse a person’s soul of all sins and even cure the sick. So Manisha had grudgingly dunked herself in the river, accidentally swallowing water in the process and receiving a bad case of giardia, and months of diarrhea, as a result.
Remembering that experience is what made today so remarkable. It was now 2025. Manisha was 27 years old and a manager for the Indian government’s Ganges Purification Initiative (GPI). Until recently, the Ganges was still one of the most polluted rivers in the world, its coliform bacteria levels astronomical due to the frequent disposal of human and animal corpses and of sewage (back in 2010, 89 million liters per day) directly into the river. Dozens of organized attempts to clean the Ganges over the years had failed. In 2009, the World Bank even loaned India $1 billion to support the government’s multi-billion dollar cleanup initiative. But then the pandemic hit, and that funding dried up. But what didn’t dry up was the government’s commitment to cleaning the Ganges — now not just an issue of public health but increasingly one of national pride.
WASHINGTON, May 31, 2011
"The World Bank today approved a US$1 billion credit and loan as part of its long-term support for the government’s Mission Clean Ganga that seeks to rejuvenate India’s iconic river."
"Despite its iconic status and religious heritage, the Ganga today is facing extreme pollution pressures and associated threats to its biodiversity and environmental sustainability."
Manisha watched as an engineering team began unloading equipment on the banks. Many top Indian scientists and engineers had been recruited by the government to develop tools and strategies for cleaning the Ganges in more high-tech ways. Her favorite were the submersible bots that continuously “swam” the river to detect, through sensors, the presence of chemical pathogens. New riverside filtration systems that sucked in dirty river water and spit out far cleaner water were also impressive — especially because on the outside they were designed to look like mini-temples. In fact, that’s why Manisha was at the river today, to oversee the installation of a filtration system located not even 100 feet from where she first stepped into the Ganges as a girl. The water looked so much cleaner now, and recent tests suggested that it might even meet drinkability standards by 2035. Manisha was tempted to kick off her shoe and dip her toe in, but this was a restricted area now — and she, of all people, would never break that law.
Here is the speech of Thierry Baundet, where he quotes the TRF "lock step" scenario:
Thierry Baudet is the founder and leader of Forum for Democracy, and has been a member of the Dutch House of Representatives since 2017. He also serves as the party's parliamentary leader.
— Free Observer (@FreeObserver3) June 6, 2021
Exposes The Rockefeller Lock Step Plan from 2010 in the Dutch Senate.@thierrybaudet pic.twitter.com/vPwxkvc9Sp
Fact Check-COVID-19 is not a ‘flu variety’ predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation’s ‘lock step’ scenario
By Reuters Fact Check JULY 13, 20215:16 PM
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-planned/fact-check-covid-19-is-not-a-flu-variety-predicted-by-the-rockefeller-foundations-lock-step-scenario-idUSL1N2OP1JJ
"The COVID-19 pandemic was not predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010.
The suggestion was made in a speech viewed 40,000 times (here) by Dutch politician Thierry Baudet (twitter.com/thierrybaudet) who previously made statements rated as false by a European fact-checking project (here).
In an email to Reuters, Baudet said he stands by his arguments made in the video. This check will examine his principle claims.
THE LOCK STEP SCENARIO
Baudet began his speech by outlining a 2010 report by the Rockefeller Foundation (here) called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (here). Baudet compares the study with the coronavirus pandemic and claims all the report’s predictions have been realised.
However, the report did not predict the 2020 pandemic. The document imagined four “plausible and provocative” narratives, one of which described a post-pandemic world with authoritarian leadership and growing citizen pushback.
This scenario, called “lock step”, outlined a 2012 pandemic caused by wild geese that killed eight million people in seven months, mostly young and healthy adults. It did not predict the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, which has so far killed 3.7 million people globally (covid19.who.int/).
Reuters debunked this conspiracy in April alongside other false evidence indicating that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned (here).
When Reuters spoke to Baudet about this claim, he said: “The gist of the presented chain of events in the lockstep scenario is surprisingly similar to the reality as we experience it today 10 years later. Including the unusually harsh and intrusive government behaviour.
“This is food for thought and reason for concern. No more and no less.”
THE EXISTENCE OF COVID-19
To corroborate the alleged hoax, Baudet said the world “pretends” lockdowns are for COVID-19, a “flu variety”, while “the thing that we used to call flu has completely disappeared”. This is false.
As Reuters explained previously, the virus that causes COVID-19 is a coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 and has been isolated by numerous scientists (here), while low flu levels are likely the result of coronavirus measures (here).
GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
Finally, Baudet alluded to a conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was organised by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
He told the Dutch parliament: “This COVID phase has been practice to train obedience… Congratulations, Klaus Schwab will be proud of you. The globalist plans can be carried out and the next step towards mass surveillance and total control can be taken.”
His statement hints at misinformation that the WEF, founded and headed by Klaus Schwab (here), wants to control people and abolish private ownership (here , here).
This conspiracy is often connected with false claims about the COVID-19 pandemic (here), but sometimes conflates with the day’s news agenda, such as the formation of the failed European Super League (here) or food insecurity (here).
VERDICT
False. The COVID-19 pandemic is not a “flu variety” that was predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, nor is it a period of training people to be obedient in the face of “total control”.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts here ."
Meanwhile. The Msn carry's out #Rockefeller 's big plan. pic.twitter.com/NmslSfuZgQ
— Xeno (@Xeno54716190) June 11, 2021
Krijgt @thierrybaudet weer gelijk?#MarkSharman former British broadcasting executive confirms world wide #lockstep #fear and #Propaganda campaign#Rockefeller#TheSickReset pic.twitter.com/MVdovhwlNn
— Sigrid Schwab (@SchwuasKlab) March 26, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment