whoever had any doubts about the key leading role of The Rockefeller Foundation (TRF) in the current global repression regime or would claim that such claims would be "conspiracy theory", may read a key conspiracy document of TRF. I will quote the complete letter of the TRF president and the chapter "LOCK STEP", which we experienced as LOCKDOWN during the false global Covid-19 pandemic.
What the TRF envisaged in 2010 and was implemented with the Covid plan in 2020 is the GLEICHSCHALTUNG of all states, media, companies and scientists and thus a global corporatist fascist world coup. It is the globalized power grabbing modeled on the fascist seizures of power in the 20th century
From German: World coup with "corona rules" is cheap and effective!
Just for fun, as a real satire I completely quote a "fact check" of REUTERS, which refers to this report of TRF and struggles to criticize the Dutch politician Thierry Baudet who "compares the study with the coronavirus pandemic and claims all the report’s predictions have been realised". Reuters fact checkers must be very silly nitpickers, who believe to debunk by saying that the pandemic in the TRF document was not named Covid-19 or was influenza virus from geese instead of the fake corona virus from bats.
This report was produced by
The Rockefeller Foundation
and Global Business Network.
May 2010
Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet.
They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure. Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world!"
The chapters from the document is between separation lines in italic type letters and some statements and notions are kept bold. I will comment before each block between the lines.
You may download the complete document from following links:
The company which contributed to this report of TRF is Global Business Network (GBN).
Global Business Network
Business: Industry Consulting
Founded: 1987; 36 years ago in Berkeley, California, United States
Founders: Peter Schwartz, Jay Ogilvy, Stewart Brand, Napier Collyns, Lawrence Wilkinson
Defunct: January 2013
Fate: Acquired by Deloitte
Headquarters: San Francisco, USA
Parent: Monitor Deloitte
“Global Business Network (GBN) was a leading[1] consulting firm that specialized in helping organizations to adapt and grow in an uncertain and volatile world. The firm was particularly well-known for using tools such as scenario planning and also offered experiential learning with networks of experts and futurists (dubbed “Remarkable People”, or RPs).
GBN advised businesses, non-profits and governments on how to address critical challenges and anticipate possible trends that could shape the future.
Originally an independent firm, GBN became part of the Monitor Group in 2000, which was then in turn acquired by Deloitte. GBN was based in San Francisco, and had offices in New York City, London, and Cambridge, Massachusetts.“
Scenarios for the future of technology and international development
This report was produced by
The Rockefeller Foundation
and Global Business Network.
May 2010
As Edward Bernays expressed in his famous book "Propaganda", not the politicians rule but the real leaders we don't know.
Edward Bernays: Conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses!
"„THE conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.
Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet.
They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure. Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world!"
In the preface letter of the president of TRF Judith Rodin we learn about the hubris of global feudal money oligarchy to rule the world since 1913!
Many scenarios were planned and implemented. The biggest one was or is still the Event 201:
Merciless switching of the Covid-19 "exercise" into a real and worldwide mass hysteria and mass psychosis for the implementation of global trauma-based mind control!
Letter from Judith Rodin
President of the Rockefeller Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation supports work that expands opportunity and strengthens resilience to social, economic, health, and environmental challenges — affirming its pioneering philanthropic mission, since 1913, to “promote the well-being” of humanity. We take a synergistic, strategic approach that places a high value on innovative processes and encourages new ways of seeking ideas, to break down silos and encourage interdisciplinary thinking.
One important — and novel — component of our strategy toolkit is scenario planning, a process of creating narratives about the future based on factors likely to affect a particular set of challenges and opportunities. We believe that scenario planning has great potential for use in philanthropy to identify unique interventions, simulate and rehearse important decisions that could have profound implications, and highlight previously undiscovered areas of connection and intersection. Most important, by providing a methodological structure that helps us focus on what we don’t know — instead of what we already know — scenario planning allows us to achieve impact more effectively.
The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the future of globalization, as you will see in the following pages. This report is crucial reading for anyone interested in creatively considering the multiple, divergent ways in which our world could evolve. The sparks of insight inspiring these narratives — along with their implications for philanthropy as a whole — were generated through the invaluable collaboration of grantee representatives, external experts, and Rockefeller Foundation staff. I offer a special thanks to Peter Schwartz, Andrew Blau, and the entire team at Global Business Network, who have helped guide us through this stimulating and energizing process. Leading this effort at the Rockefeller Foundation is our Research Unit, which analyzes emerging risks and opportunities and thinks imaginatively about how to respond to the complex, rapidly changing world around us. This outward-looking intelligence function adopts a cross-cutting mindset that synthesizes and integrates knowledge that accelerates our ability to act more quickly and effectively. It has also helped to shape and build the notion of “pro-poor foresight” that is committed to applying forward-looking tools and techniques to improve the lives of poor and vulnerable populations around the world.
Judith Rodin
President
The Rockefeller Foundation
The corporatist top-down government is de facto implemented with Eugenicists like Bill Gates controlling the World Health Organization and dictating nearly all national governments to implement repressive measures against own populations under the pretext of a fake pandemic. Instead of Coronavirus in 2019 originating from bats the TRF proposed for its scenario in 2012 a "new influenza strain" "originating from wild geese". We get the hint that all pandemic scenarios were faked!
The targets of such scenarios are:
- Kill and sterilize the young and healthy!
- Break the global supply chains!
- Destroy the global economy!
- Prohibit international mobility!
- End all individual traveling!
Not only to kill many millions but billions, because Eugenics orders to reduce the world population from today's 8,000 million to a maximum of 500 million!
For all that a disease is the optimal option, because by that the perpetrators cannot be blamed for killing the people by a nuclear bombardment world war. The Eugenicists are fanatic environmentalists. They want to protect the nature when they kill the humanity.
As the Eugenicists cannot give up to be racists, they cannot hide their intention to mainly eliminate the people in "Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America".
The reason China is framed positively is that this country is the main target for economic, social and political breakdown.
The prescribed repressions by TRF are
- mandatory wearing of face masks to
- body-temperature checks
- restrictions to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets,
- more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities,
- firmer grip on power,
- biometric IDs for all citizens,
- tighter regulation of key industries,
- government outlawed high- emitting vehicles,
- irresponsible elites increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens,
- monopolistic companies made significant advances.
All what we still experience!
LOCK STEP
A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high- emitting vehicles.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them.
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high- emitting vehicles.
In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
This part is more about what the globalists don't want. They would like to prevent resistance of national states against global government.
This part is more about what the globalists don't want. They would like to prevent resistance of national states against global government.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them.
Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
It would be good for the developing countries to ditch all European and US-American influence and strangulating IP regulations.
One of the main targets of the US-imperialists is to breakdown Nigeria in smaller pieces after instigating civil unrest and civil war. That is the reason, this country is named here. However, this motive is used to show how the "good willing" of "lock step" could be tarnished by uprising against the global governance.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
THE 17 GOALS
https://sdgs.un.org/goals
HEADLINES IN LOCK STEP
2010 - 2030
ROLE OF PHILANTHROPY IN LOCK STEP
Philanthropic organizations will face hard choices in this world. Given the strong role of governments, doing philanthropy will require heightened diplomacy skills and the ability to operate effectively in extremely divergent environments. Philanthropy grantee and civil society relationships will be strongly moderated by government, and some foundations might choose to align themselves more closely with national official development assistance (ODA) strategies and government objectives.
Larger philanthropies will retain an outsized share of influence, and many smaller philanthropies may find value in merging financial, human, and operational resources. Philanthropic organizations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms will get blocked at many nations’ borders. Developing smart, flexible, and wide-ranging relationships in this world will be key; some philanthropies may choose to work only in places where their skills and services don’t meet resistance. Many governments will place severe restrictions on the program areas and geographies that international philanthropies can work in, leading to a narrower and stronger geographic focus or grant-making in their home country only.
TECHNOLOGY IN LOCK STEP
India Once Released 25,000 Flesh-Eating Turtles Into the Ganges
A plan to clean up corpses failed due to lack of planning
Fact Check-COVID-19 is not a ‘flu variety’ predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation’s ‘lock step’ scenario
By Reuters Fact Check JULY 13, 20215:16 PM
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-planned/fact-check-covid-19-is-not-a-flu-variety-predicted-by-the-rockefeller-foundations-lock-step-scenario-idUSL1N2OP1JJ
"The COVID-19 pandemic was not predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010.
The suggestion was made in a speech viewed 40,000 times (here) by Dutch politician Thierry Baudet (twitter.com/thierrybaudet) who previously made statements rated as false by a European fact-checking project (here).
In an email to Reuters, Baudet said he stands by his arguments made in the video. This check will examine his principle claims.
THE LOCK STEP SCENARIO
Baudet began his speech by outlining a 2010 report by the Rockefeller Foundation (here) called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (here). Baudet compares the study with the coronavirus pandemic and claims all the report’s predictions have been realised.
However, the report did not predict the 2020 pandemic. The document imagined four “plausible and provocative” narratives, one of which described a post-pandemic world with authoritarian leadership and growing citizen pushback.
This scenario, called “lock step”, outlined a 2012 pandemic caused by wild geese that killed eight million people in seven months, mostly young and healthy adults. It did not predict the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, which has so far killed 3.7 million people globally (covid19.who.int/).
Reuters debunked this conspiracy in April alongside other false evidence indicating that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned (here).
When Reuters spoke to Baudet about this claim, he said: “The gist of the presented chain of events in the lockstep scenario is surprisingly similar to the reality as we experience it today 10 years later. Including the unusually harsh and intrusive government behaviour.
“This is food for thought and reason for concern. No more and no less.”
THE EXISTENCE OF COVID-19
To corroborate the alleged hoax, Baudet said the world “pretends” lockdowns are for COVID-19, a “flu variety”, while “the thing that we used to call flu has completely disappeared”. This is false.
As Reuters explained previously, the virus that causes COVID-19 is a coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 and has been isolated by numerous scientists (here), while low flu levels are likely the result of coronavirus measures (here).
GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
Finally, Baudet alluded to a conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was organised by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
He told the Dutch parliament: “This COVID phase has been practice to train obedience… Congratulations, Klaus Schwab will be proud of you. The globalist plans can be carried out and the next step towards mass surveillance and total control can be taken.”
His statement hints at misinformation that the WEF, founded and headed by Klaus Schwab (here), wants to control people and abolish private ownership (here , here).
This conspiracy is often connected with false claims about the COVID-19 pandemic (here), but sometimes conflates with the day’s news agenda, such as the formation of the failed European Super League (here) or food insecurity (here).
VERDICT
False. The COVID-19 pandemic is not a “flu variety” that was predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, nor is it a period of training people to be obedient in the face of “total control”.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts here ."
“IT IS POSSIBLE TO DISCIPLINE AND CONTROL SOME SOCIETIES FOR SOME TIME, BUT NOT THE WHOLE WORLD ALL THE TIME.”
– GK Bhat, TARU Leading Edge, India
– GK Bhat, TARU Leading Edge, India
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
It would be good for the developing countries to ditch all European and US-American influence and strangulating IP regulations.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
One of the main targets of the US-imperialists is to breakdown Nigeria in smaller pieces after instigating civil unrest and civil war. That is the reason, this country is named here. However, this motive is used to show how the "good willing" of "lock step" could be tarnished by uprising against the global governance.
The henchmen of TRF must be really silly or they assume that we would be sill, when they blame "something"would the imposed repression on "strictness of national boundaries", and the "something" "upset the neat order that world’s governments had worked so hard to establish"which which nothing but the coporatist, eugenic, psychopathic and pervert screenplay which they have planned and rolled out over the global organizations. They hope that all national states would implode by civil unrest and the remains could be galvanized into a One-World Government!
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.
We see that they intended to implement a global fake pandemic in 2010. So they were 10 years late, but the deadline of "Agenda 2030" demanded to prepare more and cause the more massive "Event 201" coup.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
THE 17 GOALS
https://sdgs.un.org/goals
HEADLINES IN LOCK STEP
2010 - 2030
- Quarantine Restricts In-Person Contact; Cellular Networks Overloaded (2013)
- Italy Addresses 'Immigrant Caregiver' Gap with Robots (2017)
- Intercontinental Trade Hit by Strict Pathogen Controls (2015)
- Vietnam to Require ‘A Solar Panel on Every Home’ (2022)
- Will Africa’s Embrace of Authoritarian Capitalism a la China Continue? (2018)
- Proliferating Trade Networks in Eastern and Southern Africa Strengthen Regional Ties (2023)
- African Leaders Fear Repeat of Nigeria's 2026 Government Collapse (2028)
Hopefully this will end in only one role for all "philanthropist" global oligarchs, who were involved in this assault on humanity, namely sitting in jail for the rest of their lifetime. The hazardous George Soros who pokered too much with power by money, is already blocked in some countries, where he financed artificial civil unrest by organizing colored demonstrations and fake revolutions.
Philanthropic organizations will face hard choices in this world. Given the strong role of governments, doing philanthropy will require heightened diplomacy skills and the ability to operate effectively in extremely divergent environments. Philanthropy grantee and civil society relationships will be strongly moderated by government, and some foundations might choose to align themselves more closely with national official development assistance (ODA) strategies and government objectives.
Larger philanthropies will retain an outsized share of influence, and many smaller philanthropies may find value in merging financial, human, and operational resources. Philanthropic organizations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms will get blocked at many nations’ borders. Developing smart, flexible, and wide-ranging relationships in this world will be key; some philanthropies may choose to work only in places where their skills and services don’t meet resistance. Many governments will place severe restrictions on the program areas and geographies that international philanthropies can work in, leading to a narrower and stronger geographic focus or grant-making in their home country only.
In many developing countries large technological projects are very successful, as long as US-american and European corporations are not involved! The main developments come in cooperation with China! The intention of TRF is to look on the restrictive technologies, which became norm by their global LOCKDOWN alias "LOCK STEP".
While there is no way of accurately predicting what the important technological advancements will be in the future, the scenario narratives point to areas where conditions may enable or accelerate the development of certain kinds of technologies.
Thus for each scenario we offer a sense of the context for technological innovation, taking into consideration the pace, geography, and key creators. We also suggest a few technology trends and applications that could flourish in each scenario.
Technological innovation in “Lock Step” is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance, large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.
• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.
• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lower- bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.
• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls.
Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
Thus for each scenario we offer a sense of the context for technological innovation, taking into consideration the pace, geography, and key creators. We also suggest a few technology trends and applications that could flourish in each scenario.
Technological innovation in “Lock Step” is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance, large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.
• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.
• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lower- bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.
• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls.
Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
Sure the Ganges River is dirty, but it has also its own biologic symbiosis. The dead bodies are eaten by specific turtles! Indians should not hunt them.
India Once Released 25,000 Flesh-Eating Turtles Into the Ganges
A plan to clean up corpses failed due to lack of planning
Shannon Palus
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/indias-government-once-released-25000-flesh-eating-turtles-ganges-river-180953384/
LIFE IN LOCK STEP
Manisha gazed out on the Ganges River, mesmerized by what she saw. Back in 2010, when she was 12 years old, her parents had brought her to this river so that she could bathe in its holy waters. But standing at the edge, Manisha had been afraid. It wasn’t the depth of the river or its currents that had scared her, but the water itself:
it was murky and brown and smelled pungently of trash and dead things. Manisha had balked, but her mother had pushed her forward, shouting that this river flowed from the lotus feet of Vishnu and she should be honored to enter it. Along with millions of Hindus, her mother believed the Ganges’s water could cleanse a person’s soul of all sins and even cure the sick. So Manisha had grudgingly dunked herself in the river, accidentally swallowing water in the process and receiving a bad case of giardia, and months of diarrhea, as a result.
Remembering that experience is what made today so remarkable. It was now 2025. Manisha was 27 years old and a manager for the Indian government’s Ganges Purification Initiative (GPI). Until recently, the Ganges was still one of the most polluted rivers in the world, its coliform bacteria levels astronomical due to the frequent disposal of human and animal corpses and of sewage (back in 2010, 89 million liters per day) directly into the river. Dozens of organized attempts to clean the Ganges over the years had failed. In 2009, the World Bank even loaned India $1 billion to support the government’s multi-billion dollar cleanup initiative. But then the pandemic hit, and that funding dried up. But what didn’t dry up was the government’s commitment to cleaning the Ganges — now not just an issue of public health but increasingly one of national pride.
US$1 billion Support from World Bank for Ganga Clean-up
WASHINGTON, May 31, 2011
"The World Bank today approved a US$1 billion credit and loan as part of its long-term support for the government’s Mission Clean Ganga that seeks to rejuvenate India’s iconic river."
"Despite its iconic status and religious heritage, the Ganga today is facing extreme pollution pressures and associated threats to its biodiversity and environmental sustainability."
Here is the speech of Thierry Baundet, where he quotes the TRF "lock step" scenario:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/indias-government-once-released-25000-flesh-eating-turtles-ganges-river-180953384/
Manisha gazed out on the Ganges River, mesmerized by what she saw. Back in 2010, when she was 12 years old, her parents had brought her to this river so that she could bathe in its holy waters. But standing at the edge, Manisha had been afraid. It wasn’t the depth of the river or its currents that had scared her, but the water itself:
it was murky and brown and smelled pungently of trash and dead things. Manisha had balked, but her mother had pushed her forward, shouting that this river flowed from the lotus feet of Vishnu and she should be honored to enter it. Along with millions of Hindus, her mother believed the Ganges’s water could cleanse a person’s soul of all sins and even cure the sick. So Manisha had grudgingly dunked herself in the river, accidentally swallowing water in the process and receiving a bad case of giardia, and months of diarrhea, as a result.
Remembering that experience is what made today so remarkable. It was now 2025. Manisha was 27 years old and a manager for the Indian government’s Ganges Purification Initiative (GPI). Until recently, the Ganges was still one of the most polluted rivers in the world, its coliform bacteria levels astronomical due to the frequent disposal of human and animal corpses and of sewage (back in 2010, 89 million liters per day) directly into the river. Dozens of organized attempts to clean the Ganges over the years had failed. In 2009, the World Bank even loaned India $1 billion to support the government’s multi-billion dollar cleanup initiative. But then the pandemic hit, and that funding dried up. But what didn’t dry up was the government’s commitment to cleaning the Ganges — now not just an issue of public health but increasingly one of national pride.
The World Bank loan for cleanup of the Ganges River was given in 2011.
WASHINGTON, May 31, 2011
"The World Bank today approved a US$1 billion credit and loan as part of its long-term support for the government’s Mission Clean Ganga that seeks to rejuvenate India’s iconic river."
"Despite its iconic status and religious heritage, the Ganga today is facing extreme pollution pressures and associated threats to its biodiversity and environmental sustainability."
"Today, only about one-third of the sewage generated by the towns and cities on the mainstem of the river is treated; and a significant volume of untreated or poorly treated industrial effluents are also discharged in the Ganga."
Manisha had joined the GPI in 2020, in part because she was so impressed by the government’s strong stance on restoring the ecological health of India’s most treasured resource. Many lives in her home city of Jaipur had been saved by the government’s quarantines during the pandemic, and that experience, thought Manisha, had given the government the confidence to be so strict about river usage now: how else could they get millions of Indian citizens to completely shift their cultural practices in relationship to a holy site? Discarding ritually burned bodies in the Ganges was now illegal, punishable by years of jail time. Companies found to be dumping waste of any kind in the river were immediately shut down by the government. There were also severe restrictions on where people could bathe and where they could wash clothing. Every 20 meters along the river was marked by a sign outlining the repercussions of “disrespecting India’s most treasured natural resource.” Of course, not everyone liked it; protests flared every so often. But no one could deny that the Ganges was looking more beautiful and healthier than ever.
Manisha watched as an engineering team began unloading equipment on the banks. Many top Indian scientists and engineers had been recruited by the government to develop tools and strategies for cleaning the Ganges in more high-tech ways. Her favorite were the submersible bots that continuously “swam” the river to detect, through sensors, the presence of chemical pathogens. New riverside filtration systems that sucked in dirty river water and spit out far cleaner water were also impressive — especially because on the outside they were designed to look like mini-temples. In fact, that’s why Manisha was at the river today, to oversee the installation of a filtration system located not even 100 feet from where she first stepped into the Ganges as a girl. The water looked so much cleaner now, and recent tests suggested that it might even meet drinkability standards by 2035. Manisha was tempted to kick off her shoe and dip her toe in, but this was a restricted area now — and she, of all people, would never break that law.
Manisha watched as an engineering team began unloading equipment on the banks. Many top Indian scientists and engineers had been recruited by the government to develop tools and strategies for cleaning the Ganges in more high-tech ways. Her favorite were the submersible bots that continuously “swam” the river to detect, through sensors, the presence of chemical pathogens. New riverside filtration systems that sucked in dirty river water and spit out far cleaner water were also impressive — especially because on the outside they were designed to look like mini-temples. In fact, that’s why Manisha was at the river today, to oversee the installation of a filtration system located not even 100 feet from where she first stepped into the Ganges as a girl. The water looked so much cleaner now, and recent tests suggested that it might even meet drinkability standards by 2035. Manisha was tempted to kick off her shoe and dip her toe in, but this was a restricted area now — and she, of all people, would never break that law.
Here is the speech of Thierry Baundet, where he quotes the TRF "lock step" scenario:
Thierry Baudet is the founder and leader of Forum for Democracy, and has been a member of the Dutch House of Representatives since 2017. He also serves as the party's parliamentary leader.
— Free Observer (@FreeObserver3) June 6, 2021
Exposes The Rockefeller Lock Step Plan from 2010 in the Dutch Senate.@thierrybaudet pic.twitter.com/vPwxkvc9Sp
This is the silly fact checker article of Reuters.
Fact Check-COVID-19 is not a ‘flu variety’ predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation’s ‘lock step’ scenario
By Reuters Fact Check JULY 13, 20215:16 PM
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-planned/fact-check-covid-19-is-not-a-flu-variety-predicted-by-the-rockefeller-foundations-lock-step-scenario-idUSL1N2OP1JJ
"The COVID-19 pandemic was not predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010.
The suggestion was made in a speech viewed 40,000 times (here) by Dutch politician Thierry Baudet (twitter.com/thierrybaudet) who previously made statements rated as false by a European fact-checking project (here).
In an email to Reuters, Baudet said he stands by his arguments made in the video. This check will examine his principle claims.
THE LOCK STEP SCENARIO
Baudet began his speech by outlining a 2010 report by the Rockefeller Foundation (here) called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (here). Baudet compares the study with the coronavirus pandemic and claims all the report’s predictions have been realised.
However, the report did not predict the 2020 pandemic. The document imagined four “plausible and provocative” narratives, one of which described a post-pandemic world with authoritarian leadership and growing citizen pushback.
This scenario, called “lock step”, outlined a 2012 pandemic caused by wild geese that killed eight million people in seven months, mostly young and healthy adults. It did not predict the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, which has so far killed 3.7 million people globally (covid19.who.int/).
Reuters debunked this conspiracy in April alongside other false evidence indicating that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned (here).
When Reuters spoke to Baudet about this claim, he said: “The gist of the presented chain of events in the lockstep scenario is surprisingly similar to the reality as we experience it today 10 years later. Including the unusually harsh and intrusive government behaviour.
“This is food for thought and reason for concern. No more and no less.”
THE EXISTENCE OF COVID-19
To corroborate the alleged hoax, Baudet said the world “pretends” lockdowns are for COVID-19, a “flu variety”, while “the thing that we used to call flu has completely disappeared”. This is false.
As Reuters explained previously, the virus that causes COVID-19 is a coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 and has been isolated by numerous scientists (here), while low flu levels are likely the result of coronavirus measures (here).
GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
Finally, Baudet alluded to a conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was organised by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
He told the Dutch parliament: “This COVID phase has been practice to train obedience… Congratulations, Klaus Schwab will be proud of you. The globalist plans can be carried out and the next step towards mass surveillance and total control can be taken.”
His statement hints at misinformation that the WEF, founded and headed by Klaus Schwab (here), wants to control people and abolish private ownership (here , here).
This conspiracy is often connected with false claims about the COVID-19 pandemic (here), but sometimes conflates with the day’s news agenda, such as the formation of the failed European Super League (here) or food insecurity (here).
VERDICT
False. The COVID-19 pandemic is not a “flu variety” that was predicted by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, nor is it a period of training people to be obedient in the face of “total control”.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts here ."
Submissive media plays a big role in the screenplay of TRF!
Meanwhile. The Msn carry's out #Rockefeller 's big plan. pic.twitter.com/NmslSfuZgQ
— Xeno (@Xeno54716190) June 11, 2021
Krijgt @thierrybaudet weer gelijk?#MarkSharman former British broadcasting executive confirms world wide #lockstep #fear and #Propaganda campaign#Rockefeller#TheSickReset pic.twitter.com/MVdovhwlNn
— Sigrid Schwab (@SchwuasKlab) March 26, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment