CONTENT
- Greens against Nature
- Greens against Eugenics-Heresy
- Connected articles
1. Greens against Nature
Who thinks to be part of the ruling cast of the public realm, becomes self confident enough, to persecute anyone who questions, resists to and humiliates the established public mindset.
When words are not enough to keep the fraud scheme going, harder measures have to be implemented. The Inquisition of our times is breeding its "defenders of the right belief" and killers of the heretics.
As an analogy I would like to present the case of Prof. Dr. Ulrich Kutschera, who publicly did not speak about homosexuality according political correctness.
From German: Politically correct inquisition in 2019: The next heresy prosecution
https://www.journalistenwatch.com/2019/06/07/politisch-inquisition2019-der/
On the other side politicians of the Green Party, who openly promote incest and pedophilia, are not persecuted. Hans-Christian Ströbele claimed that the "criminalization of incest would be only cultural and not natural". He told that the "prohibition of incest would not fit to our time and concept of family". He did not get open public confirmation and support for that, but was also not prosecuted, damned, jailed and lynched. In another society where people protect their children, such a person would have to leave over night and never come back to survive.
From German: Green politician Ströbele wants to allow incest
https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/er-muss-weg-gruenen-politiker-stroebele-will-inzest-paragrafen-abschaffen_aid_736743.html
Every fraud has to be based on lies. But thousands of lies can be shattered by only one truth. Accordingly the marketing of Climate Geoengineering takes the next level of repression to prevent its house of cards and soap bubble to implode and explode. The fear of loss makes the profiteers and henchmen more aggressive. They want to prohibit "wrong thinking and questioning".
When words are not enough to keep the fraud scheme going, harder measures have to be implemented. The Inquisition of our times is breeding its "defenders of the right belief" and killers of the heretics.
As an analogy I would like to present the case of Prof. Dr. Ulrich Kutschera, who publicly did not speak about homosexuality according political correctness.
From German: Politically correct inquisition in 2019: The next heresy prosecution
https://www.journalistenwatch.com/2019/06/07/politisch-inquisition2019-der/
On the other side politicians of the Green Party, who openly promote incest and pedophilia, are not persecuted. Hans-Christian Ströbele claimed that the "criminalization of incest would be only cultural and not natural". He told that the "prohibition of incest would not fit to our time and concept of family". He did not get open public confirmation and support for that, but was also not prosecuted, damned, jailed and lynched. In another society where people protect their children, such a person would have to leave over night and never come back to survive.
From German: Green politician Ströbele wants to allow incest
https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/er-muss-weg-gruenen-politiker-stroebele-will-inzest-paragrafen-abschaffen_aid_736743.html
Every fraud has to be based on lies. But thousands of lies can be shattered by only one truth. Accordingly the marketing of Climate Geoengineering takes the next level of repression to prevent its house of cards and soap bubble to implode and explode. The fear of loss makes the profiteers and henchmen more aggressive. They want to prohibit "wrong thinking and questioning".
2. Greens against Eugenics-Heresy
To understand how all the green framed agenda is basically Eugenics, please check independent from my statements the targets of Eugenics, where the primary one is the depopulation of the humanity down to 500 million selected "well born". I add my articles in the final chapter.
They blame the crimes of Climate Geoengineering Industry on the people who may not be fully aware of that but dare to question the claims of fraudsters.
Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us
The victims of Hurricane Harvey have a murderer—and it’s not the storm.
By Mark HertsgaardTwitter SEPTEMBER 6, 2017
https://www.thenation.com/article/climate-denialism-is-literally-killing-us/
Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us
The victims of Hurricane Harvey have a murderer—and it’s not the storm.
By Mark HertsgaardTwitter SEPTEMBER 6, 2017
https://www.thenation.com/article/climate-denialism-is-literally-killing-us/
"It is past time to call out Trump and all climate deniers for this crime against humanity. No more treating climate denial like an honest difference of opinion."
"Shedding tears for little Jordyn Grace in Houston and her counterparts in the Himalayan lowlands is only right, but it is far from sufficient. With Hurricane Irma churning toward Florida, the horrors and heartbreaks will only get worse until we change the game for their perpetrators. The first step toward justice is to call things by their true names. Murder is murder, whether the murderers admit it or not. Punish it as such, or we encourage more of the same."
SHOULD CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS BE PROSECUTED?
WALTER OLSON ON 10/1/15 AT 5:17 PM EDT
https://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652
"Others had already gone farther than the senator himself, calling for making “climate denial” a “crime against humanity,” holding public trials of fossil fuel executives for having resisted the truth and so forth. (Gawker: “arrest climate change deniers.”)"
From German: „Coal, coal, coal“: Should the denial of climate change be punishable by law?
9. Dezember 2018 von Bernd Harder
https://blog.gwup.net/2018/12/09/kohle-kohle-kohle-sollte-klimawandelleugnung-unter-strafe-gestellt-werden/
"After months research the Süddeutsche Zeitung has detected the climate change deniers, where no one would expect them to find."
"The deniers consult as scientists in the Bundestag, they sit as conservative and liberal members of the EU-parliament, they lead neo-liberal business associations and influence the climate policy of all right wing parties in Europe."
Al Gore at SXSW: We Need to 'Punish Climate-Change Deniers' and 'Put a Price on Carbon
"Shedding tears for little Jordyn Grace in Houston and her counterparts in the Himalayan lowlands is only right, but it is far from sufficient. With Hurricane Irma churning toward Florida, the horrors and heartbreaks will only get worse until we change the game for their perpetrators. The first step toward justice is to call things by their true names. Murder is murder, whether the murderers admit it or not. Punish it as such, or we encourage more of the same."
SHOULD CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS BE PROSECUTED?
WALTER OLSON ON 10/1/15 AT 5:17 PM EDT
https://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652
"Others had already gone farther than the senator himself, calling for making “climate denial” a “crime against humanity,” holding public trials of fossil fuel executives for having resisted the truth and so forth. (Gawker: “arrest climate change deniers.”)"
From German: „Coal, coal, coal“: Should the denial of climate change be punishable by law?
9. Dezember 2018 von Bernd Harder
https://blog.gwup.net/2018/12/09/kohle-kohle-kohle-sollte-klimawandelleugnung-unter-strafe-gestellt-werden/
"After months research the Süddeutsche Zeitung has detected the climate change deniers, where no one would expect them to find."
"The deniers consult as scientists in the Bundestag, they sit as conservative and liberal members of the EU-parliament, they lead neo-liberal business associations and influence the climate policy of all right wing parties in Europe."
Al Gore at SXSW: We Need to 'Punish Climate-Change Deniers' and 'Put a Price on Carbon
Cole Mellino Mar. 16, 2015 09:37AM EST
https://www.ecowatch.com/al-gore-at-sxsw-we-need-to-punish-climate-change-deniers-and-put-a-pri-1882022405.html
"We need to put a price on carbon to accelerate these market trends,” said Gore. “And in order to do that, we need to put a price on denial in politics."
Calls to punish skeptics rise with links to climate change, hurricanesBy Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Monday, September 11, 2017
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/11/climate-change-activists-want-punishment-for-skept/
“Climate change denial should be a crime,” declared the Sept. 1 headline in the Outline. Mark Hertsgaard argued in a Sept. 7 article in the Nation, titled “Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us,” that “murder is murder” and “we should punish it as such.”
https://www.ecowatch.com/al-gore-at-sxsw-we-need-to-punish-climate-change-deniers-and-put-a-pri-1882022405.html
"We need to put a price on carbon to accelerate these market trends,” said Gore. “And in order to do that, we need to put a price on denial in politics."
Calls to punish skeptics rise with links to climate change, hurricanesBy Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Monday, September 11, 2017
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/11/climate-change-activists-want-punishment-for-skept/
“Climate change denial should be a crime,” declared the Sept. 1 headline in the Outline. Mark Hertsgaard argued in a Sept. 7 article in the Nation, titled “Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us,” that “murder is murder” and “we should punish it as such.”
The following article by Richard Parncutt is a prime example of artificial dumbing down and transformation into a criminal on the basis of pseudo-scientific brainwashing!
According to his website and Wikipedia article about him, he studied "music and physics at the University of Melbourne, and physics at the University of New England, Australia. In 1987, he was awarded a PhD from the University of New England. He was a guest researcher under Ernst Terhardt (Munich), Johan Sundberg (Stockholm), Annabel Cohen (Halifax, Canada), Al Bregman (Montreal), Helga de la Motte-Haber (Berlin) and John Sloboda (Keele, England). From 1996 to 1998 he held a position as a lecturer in psychology at Keele University, UK."
Obviously, Mr. Parncutt didn't really study or understand physics, much less add knowledge of meteorology and climatology to understand that all that he describes as harmful is the result of commercial and military applications of climate control. He would have to replace "climate change" with "climate control" everywhere in his text in order to reveal the truth of his own statements.
The right to life of climate deniers, children in poverty, and future generations
Richard Parncutt February 2017, revised March 2019
http://www.parncutt.org/dp2.html
This paragraph was modified and does not exist anymore:
"Given this background, my main intention was to defend the right to life of those who will suffer most from climate change. In the discussion that followed the discovery of my outrageous text, hardly anyone mentioned that point, as if those people in developing countries did not exist or did not matter. Today, little has changed. How much longer do we have to wait for the right to life of a billion people in developing countries to be taken seriously?"
Following quotes are from later revision:
"Given that our main task as human rights activists is to sustainably stop the killing by any reasonable means, I proposed a new way to end the death penalty in practice, if not in law: If the death penalty were restricted by international agreement to criminals whose actions had caused a million deaths (incidentally saving all prisoners on all death rows in all countries), some influential climate deniers would become death-penalty candidates."
"The most important point in my text was that anthropogenic AGW will cause the premature deaths of hundreds of millions or perhaps billions of people, via complex but well-understood chains of cause and effect. That was obvious then to anyone who considered the IPCC predictions and their human consequences, and it is even more obvious now, but still hardly anyone (including the IPCC itself) has the courage to talk about it. Those few messages I received in late 2012 and early 2013 that addressed this issue did so only to ridicule it."
"Meanwhile, there can be no doubt that the claim is true. It is obvious even without reading my article on the topic. I have read all kinds of relevant academic literature and I am not aware of any plausible counterargument. Of course climate deniers are constantly denying any and all aspects of climate science, but to my knowledge none of them has yet managed to invent a good reason why this specific claim might be incorrect. It is time to start talking about the future victims of AGW and their inalienable human rights. Better late than never!"
"It was clear in 2012, and it is still clear today, that hundreds of millions of people will die in the future from AGW. Possibly, billions. It was also clear, and remains so, that influential climate deniers were indirectly causing those future deaths by promoting fossil fuels and blocking climate action."
"As if that was not shocking enough, almost no-one in the world was talking about this connection. A group of people was (and still is) causing hundreds of millions of future deaths by spreading misinformation. People were (and still are) talking about the misinformation, but no-one was mentioning that the misinformation was causing enormous numbers of human deaths. That the deniers were causing the future premature deaths of enormous numbers of future people."
"How does one respond to such an urgent situation? I decided on a new strategy: to speak the language of the deniers, many of whom support the death penalty (along with a shopping list of other conservative desiderata such as no abortion, low taxes, market deregulation and so on). I would do that with the obvious intention of defending the right to life of countless millions of people. As a last resort in a desperate situation, I would threaten the influential deniers with death (not from me, but from their governments) unless they changed their evil ways. As a threat, the idea made perfect sense, and the text repeatedly made it clear that it was only a threat. What else could it be?"
"Why mention the death penalty at all? There is a good reason for that. Those of us who totally reject the death penalty are horrified when anyone proposes it for anyone. The death penalty is a form of premeditated murder. It may even be considered the worst kind of premeditated murder, given that the decision to kill is made not by just one person without any specific function, but by authority at the highest level of government -- often with the approval of a majority of citizens."
"Climate denial is related to premeditated murder. The deniers do not intend to kill people in the same way that murderers do. But they know that their actions will cause large numbers of future premature deaths, and they proceed all the same. Their actions are premeditated in the sense that they have always been fully aware of the consequences of their actions, due to the clear predictions of climate science and the public accessibility of the findings for the past several decades."
"We are talking about a kind of mass manslaughter. Something similar to genocide. In the past few decades, the activities of influential climate deniers have effectively put a billion children on climate death row. Mainly in the global South (but not only), children are waiting for the future climate disaster that will prematurely end their lives, whether it be due to fire, flood, famine, drought, storm, or heatwave, or some effect of climatic irregularities such as forced migration, conflict, or social or economic collapse."
"Similarly, governments and corporations have been collaborating for decades to promote the use of fossil fuels, while at the same time knowing that this “business as usual” would cause countless millions of deaths in the future. In that way, they have effectively decided together to kill countless millions of people. Of course, no-one ever said that. But the most influential participants in this process have known all along that their actions would eventually cause countless millions of premature deaths. Another interpretation is hardly possible, given that ..
- the climate science community has consistently and thoroughly informed governments and corporations about the future effects of AGW;
- death rates in connection with poverty (including hunger) would obviously increase as AGW increased, given what the climate science community was predicting (unprecedented droughts, floods, famines, heat waves, forest fires, sea-level rise and so on); and
- emissions reductions have repeatedly been negotiated in vain at the highest international levels – largely due impediments created by influential climate deniers, who in turn were often financially supported by fossil-fuel industries."
"Killing is always horrifying, and premeditated killing is even more horrifying, as the example of the death penalty shows. The horror also depends on the number of people being killed: the more dead, the greater the horror. Putting all that together makes the repeated conscious failure of rich governments and corporations, working together, to take reasonable steps to mitigate AGW into one of the most horrifying crimes ever committed, if not the most horrifying. If people don't understand how horrifying that is, as they evidently did not in 2012, it is justified to introduce a comparison with the death penalty to drive the message home, in the hope that there will finally be serious attempts to reduce global emissions. Right now in 2022, we are still waiting for that."
"We are not guilty of murder. There is no motive to kill, and most of us do not realize what we are doing. But we do know three things:
"The number 1000 is a useful one. It is also the contribution to AGW of one economy return ticket on a typical intercontinental flight, measured in Big Macs (more). Let me explain: Producing 1 kg beef also produces 15 kg CO2. That's enough for 10 Big Macs. The CO2 produced by the said flight is over 1.5 tonnes per economy seat, or 1000 Big Macs. In fact, the effect of flying on AGW is about twice the effect of the CO2 due to other greenhouse gases and their interaction, so make that 2000."We are not guilty of murder. There is no motive to kill, and most of us do not realize what we are doing. But we do know three things:
- Poverty (and associated hunger, disease, and violence) is causing millions of premature deaths every year.
- AGW will seriously increase that number by limiting supplies of food and fresh water.
- Our emissions are causing AGW. Insofar as we have known all three things for a long time and have not changed our behavior accordingly, we (the middle-class citizens of rich countries) are guilty of involuntary manslaughter. That verdict applies to most of us. It certainly applies to me, considering how far I have flown in my life. If ever there was an "inconvenient truth", that's it.
For reasons of this kind, I have now practically stopped flying, driving, and eating meat. Given the facts, what other option do we have? I also spend much of my spare time informing others about this situation (e.g., in social media) and contributing to political climate action (Extinction Rebellion, Fridays for Future). Many others have made similar lifestyle changes. For the sake of the world's innocent children: please join us."
3. Connected articles
Ugly face of the Greens! The pedophile agenda of the Greens.
Geoengineering SRM: Promises of Swindlers! "Control means financial, sexual or psychological control!"
Eugenic (dysgenic) sexual disorientation as an effect of the pill and other hormone-active substances!
What is CLIMATE CONTROL? Who does it, who benefits & who is harmed?
The Great Eugenic Anti-Intelligence Test! Those who pass are "released" by "vaccination"!
Who is against eugenic globalist justice? Sarcasm on the gallows of Eugenics!
Eugenic population control (global mass murder) through global sterilization with synchronized vaccination!
No comments:
Post a Comment