CONTENT
- Terminal pseudo-science!
- Discussion with a friend
- Listen to Club of Rome!
- Do we challenge them?
- Connected articles
This article is still in development. I am brainstorming. Join me.
Here is an terminal evidence of pseudo-scientific idiocy, demanding that humans should not breathe, as they would emit CO2, Methane & Nitrous-Oxide. For anyone with a little working brain, this article ridicules the whole "global-warming" narrative. But most of the educated morons with diploma & title, this shit is "science". Nearly all other people are unable to question anything with a science tag. They believe in "science" without any doubt & resistance.
The whole article is real satire, but I don't assume the writer and publisher is aware of that. My comments & quotes will be separated with a "*** *** ***" line.
Now scientists say BREATHING is bad for the environment: Gases we exhale contribute to 0.1% of the UK's greenhouse gas emissions
Two greenhouse gases - both more potent than CO2 - are in human breath
One is methane which is famously also emitted from livestock such as cows
By JONATHAN CHADWICK FOR MAILONLINE, PUBLISHED: 19:00 GMT, 13 December 2023
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12859057/Now-scientists-say-BREATHING-bad-environment-Gases-exhale-contribute-0-1-UKs-greenhouse-gas-emissions.html
The article begins with the "well established" lies and demands to stop breathing to "save the climate"!
Be aware,
- "greenhouse gas",
- "greenhouse effect",
- "warming CO2 reflection of infrared rays",
- "global warming",
- "positive feedback"
are brazen non-scientific, manipulative notions and the climate is changed intentionally by global scale Climate Engineering. Based on that knowledge, evaluate the statements of the pseudo-scientific artificial idiots!
"Whether it's eating less meat or cycling instead of driving, humans can do many things to help prevent climate change.
Unfortunately, breathing less isn't one of them.
That might be a problem, as a new study claims the gases in air exhaled from human lungs is fueling global warming."
Be aware that Methane & Nitrious-Oxide are very rare. The total share of Methane in the atmosphere is0.000018% and nearly 99,99% is emitted naturally without any human involvement. The same applies for NOx. The result would be 0.000000018% human contribution to Methane for pure existence. The articles expects from humans mass suicide to "save the climate".
"Methane and nitrous oxide in the air we exhale makes up to 0.1 per cent of the UK's greenhouse gas emissions, scientists say.
And that's not even accounting for the gas we release from burps and farts, or emissions that come from our skin without us noticing."
"Composition of exhaled human breath
- - Nitrogen (N) - 78%
- - Oxygen (O2)* - 17%
- - Carbon dioxide (CO2) - 4%
- - Other gases including methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) – 1%
*Exhaled human breath contains oxygen, but just less oxygen than the air we inhaled"
*** *** ***
The author reveals the name of the pseudo-scientific moron with diploma & title & the morons nest!
"The new study was led by Dr Nicholas Cowan, an atmospheric physicist at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Edinburgh.
'Exhaled human breath can contain small, elevated concentrations of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), both of which contribute to global warming,' Dr Cowan and colleagues say.
'We would urge caution in the assumption that emissions from humans are negligible.'"
*** *** ***
With the next passage "Dr" Cowan ridicules his former claim. Animals (also humans) live in a symbiosis with plants. It is the balance between CO2 & O2!
"As most of us remember from science classes at school, humans breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide.
When we inhale, air enters the lungs, and oxygen from that air moves to the blood, while carbon dioxide (CO2), a waste gas, moves from the blood to the lungs and is breathed out.
With plants, it is the other way round; plants use CO2 to create oxygen as a by-product (the process known as photosynthesis)."
*** *** ***
But these pseudo-scientist morons are deadly brainwashed. The cannot think logically and follow their deadly program of promoting the global depopulation. Heureka, they have "discovered" that humans breathe in and out!
"Every person breathes out CO2 when they exhale, but in their new study, the researchers focused on methane and nitrous oxide.
These two are both powerful greenhouse gases, but because they're breathed out in much smaller quantities, their contribution to global warming may have been overlooked.
When we inhale, air enters the lungs, and oxygen from that air moves to the blood, while CO2, a waste gas, moves from the blood to the lungs and is breathed out."
*** *** ***
"What's more, plants essentially soak up all the CO2 that's emitted in human breath, so 'CO2 contribution in human breath to climate change is essentially zero,' Dr Cowan told MailOnline.
The same cannot be said for methane and nitrous oxide, as plants don't use these gases in photosynthesis."
*** *** ***
Have the "volunteers" been euthanized after the study to prevent them from further emitting CH4 & NOx? Don't breath, don't fart, don't sweat, don't burb?
"For the study, the researchers investigated emissions of methane and nitrous oxide in human breath from 104 adult volunteers from the UK population."
"Researchers say those who do not exhale methane in their breath are still likely to 'release the gas in flatus' – in other words, by farting.
Interestingly, people with methane in their exhaled breath were more likely to be female and above the age of 30, but researchers aren't sure why."
*** *** ***
The pseudo-scientists reveal implicitly that vegans & vegetarians produce more Methane, because they eat like cows! :-) Meat eaters don't!
"Researchers didn't manage to find any link between gases in the breath and diets – although meat eaters are known to fuel the climate crisis in other ways."
*** *** ***
The other "scientist" don't ignore but well know how dumb and ridiculous it would be to write such a crap. Should the people be killed before they become old?
"According to the authors, emissions of methane and nitrous oxide are 'generally ignored in most environmental monitoring' as they're considered negligible.
However, further study of human emissions of these gases - not just from our breath - could reveal more about 'the impacts of an ageing population and shifting diets,' the team say."
*** *** ***
Another capital "discovery" of the pseudo-scientists ist that we have microorganisms in our digestive tract and we learn how dumb the responsibles of the "journal PLOS One" must be to publish this idiotic paper. Read that magazine for real satire. I am sure they have a collection of such pseudo-scientific stupidities.
"Inside the human body, methane gas is produced by microorganisms called methanogens, which colonise our digestive tract.
The methane crosses into the blood and is carried to the lungs where it can be exhaled in breath.
Meanwhile, bacteria in the gut and oral cavity turns nitrates in food and water to nitrous oxide, which also escapes in human breath.
The study has been published in the journal PLOS One."
*** *** ***
In the following list of statements only the first & fourth are true & ninth is partly true . All the others are pure lies! Methane, CO2 & NOx are to 99,99% produced by natural processes, mainly volcanic eruptions.
How do greenhouse gases like methane and CO2 warm up the planet?
- TRUE: Methane is a colourless, odourless flammable gas, and the main constituent of natural gas.
- FALSE: Methane is a greenhouse gas, and the second biggest cause of climate change after carbon dioxide.
- FALSE: Both gases trap heat in the atmosphere, similar to the glass roof of a greenhouse.
- TRUE: During the day, the sun shines through the atmosphere and Earth's surface warms up in the sunlight.
- FALSE: At night, the Earth's surface cools, releasing heat back into the air, but some of the heat is trapped by the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
- FALSE: Too much of these gases can cause Earth's atmosphere to trap more and more heat, causing the planet to warm up.
- FALSE: Methane has more than 80 times the heat-trapping potency of carbon dioxide over the first 20 years after it reaches the atmosphere.
- FALSE: However this does decrease over time, as it breaks down over the course of about a decade.
- PARTLY TRUE: It is emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas and oil, as well as from livestock and decaying organic waste at landfill sites."
2. Discussion with a friend
Reading this friend said "I doubt anyone can be that stupid, @Enkidu_G. They can’t be that stupid – they are criminals with a task to justify genocide over the global population. They have to be eliminated before it happens."
Believe me, there are many total idiots with diplomas and titles. I have talked to some of them directly. They are useful idiots for the Eugenicists, which are highly educated and rich psychopaths & morons like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates. When You follow their logic, You will see how conclusive it is.
Consider what beauty in nature really means. It is a natural habitat without human footprint. Extending the forests, reducing the civilizations, reducing the trash and plunder on natural resources rebuilds the beauty of nature.
Imagine natural strands where sea turtles hatch.
clean rivers where no trash, no cosmetic, agricultural-pharma, medical chemicals exist,
forests, where no tree is felled to be turned into furniture or burned as fire wood and pellet.
It is sheer impossible to question this.
No one can really claim that all this dirt, contamination & nearly 1 billion humans living like rats on the streets would be the alternative to Eugenics.
3. Listen to Club of Rome!
The "experts" of Club of Rome are nothing but self-conceiting stooges of the CIA & US-American imperial crime complex. The documented history begins with confidential "Memorandum of Climate Control" of 1960 & for the public "The Restoring the Quality of our Environment" of 1965.
By his statements, he reveals that he his totally unaware of Climate Engineering and he doesn't really know physics & meteorology. He must have been suggestively framed, even hypnotized systematically to get stuck in this abhorrent quagmire of pseudo-scientific lies.
Such an pseudo-scientific idiot, who his framed to deem himself as a scientist, moral authority, scientific prophet, adviser of political leaders, brainwasher of the students at the university, without having a hint about his artificial idiocy is a nightmare monster. This idiot will die dumb, leaven a mess and carnage on the globe, without feeling remorse.
50 Years of "Limits to Growth". With Prof. Dr. Dennis Meadows, Saori Dubourg & Dr. Patrick Graichen
Arts & Nature Social Club, Dec 19, 2022
"CLUB OF ROME SALON
a Collaboration between Arts & Nature Social Club & Club of Rome Deutschland
50 Years of "Limits to Growth"
Lessons learned, implications, and opportunities for transformation
This salon is being organized in cooperation with BMW Foundation Herbert Quandt and carried out together with DZ BANK AG."
"Guests:
We would like to invite you to an inspiring salon evening with the following guests:
Prof. Dr. Dennis Meadows, Co-Author, The Limits to Growth (1972); Emeritus Professor of Systems Management; President, Laboratory for Interactive Learning
Saori Dubourg, Member, Board of Executive Directors, BASF SE; Chair, BASF Corporate Sustainability Board; Member, German Council for Sustainable Development
Dr. Patrick Graichen, State Secretary, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs & Climate Action"
"About this Salon
The Club of Rome, a global think tank, has been committed to the sustainable future of humanity since 1968, focusing on major trends against the background of long-term and interdisciplinary thinking. The purpose of this salon series carrying its name is to highlight areas where systemic changes can make a significant difference for a better future.
What conclusions can be drawn from The Limits to Growth? Which one of the scenarios represented in the book is the development path we are on? And what actions can be taken based on the insights gained? The Limits to Growth is causing as much controversy today as it did when it was first published in 1972: questioning the paradigm of never-ending economic growth seems to be indisputable to some while others – including the Club of Rome – look at it as a necessity to remain within the confines set by planetary boundaries.
The core message of The Limits to Growth indicates that population growth in conjunction with excessive resource consumption and capital growth undoubtedly results in a collapse scenario. The application of technology to apparent environmental problems may delay such a scenario but not put an end to it. Even within the “green movement,” there are diverging opinions on whether there can be green growth or whether degrowth is a viable option.
The dialog will focus on the consequences of The Limits to Growth in relation to today’s political and economic challenges. The speakers will explore which economic limitations may already exist with regards to the consumption of natural resources or the emission of greenhouse gases. We will discuss the necessity for political decisions and regulatory adaptations (such as a carbon taxes) as well as future-oriented measures in the German and global economy driven by responsible corporations.
Prof. Dr. Dennis Meadows led the research team at MIT whose efforts culminated in The Limits to Growth (1972). He has been a tenured professor in faculties of management, engineering, and social sciences. Prof. Meadows has developed innovative and complex strategic games. He has received numerous international awards for his work, including the Japan Prize in April 2009.
Ms. Saori Dubourg is Member of the Board of Executive Directors of BASF SE. She is responsible for BASF’s global businesses in Monomers, Performance Materials, Petrochemicals, and Intermediates. Furthermore, she oversees the region Europe, the startup trinamiX, and the BASF Corporate Sustainability Board.
Dr. Patrick Graichen serves as State Secretary, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs & Climate Action. From 2014 to 2021, he was Executive Director and Managing Director of Agora Energiewende, a non- profit think tank that develops strategies to advance the goal of climate neutrality in Germany, Europe, and the rest of the world.
The speakers’ impulse statements will be followed by a conversation moderated by Jörg Geier to further explore the topic."
If we are unable to challenge the Eugenics utopia with a better alternative, the case is lost for us.
- It is evident, that we don't have a conclusive alternative,
- we are not globally organized,
- we don't have the control on financial & material resources,
- we have no military and judicial power.
We Love Earth, Sep 4, 2017
"When it comes to hope, Meadows – knowing collapse of the current global system is certain – hopes for a peaceful, slow collapse, more like a degrowth transition. To get there still requires revolutions, very many revolutions, on all thinkable levels – from the personal to the way we organise politics and the way we reward corporate CEOs. We need everything"
Moron (psychology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_(psychology)
"Moron is a term once used in psychology and psychiatry to denote mild intellectual disability.[1] The term was closely tied with the American eugenics movement.[2] Once the term became popularized, it fell out of use by the psychological community, as it was used more commonly as an insult than as a psychological term. It is similar to imbecile and idiot.[3]
Origin and uses
"Moron" was coined in 1910 by psychologist Henry H. Goddard[4] from the Ancient Greek word μωρός (moros), which meant "dull"[5] and used to describe a person with a mental age in adulthood of between 7 and 10 on the Binet scale.[6] It was once applied to people with an intelligence quotient (IQ) of 51–70, being superior in one degree to "imbecile" (IQ of 26–50) and superior in two degrees to "idiot" (IQ of 0–25). The word moron, along with others including "idiotic", "imbecilic", "stupid", and "feeble-minded", was formerly considered a valid descriptor in the psychological community, but it is now deprecated in use by psychologists.[7]
In the obsolete medical classification (ICD-9, 1977), morons and feeble-minded persons were said to have "mild mental retardation", "mild mental subnormality" or "high-grade defect" with IQ in the range 50–70.[8]
Following opposition to Goddard's attempts to popularize his ideas,[9] Goddard recanted his earlier assertions about the moron: "It may still be objected that moron parents are likely to have imbecile or idiot children. There is not much evidence that this is the case. The danger is probably negligible."[10]"
4. Do we challenge them?
What we only do is to say that Eugenics is anti-human, but the majority of the humans is too dumb & brainwashed to see the same. They rather will follow the Eugenics agenda & be voluntarily sacrificed, like they ran to the mRNA vaccinations.
Humans are generally one of the dumbest creatures on Earth, because the mutation which separated them from apes has created a damaged brain. The so called human intelligence is only a mitigating measure to reduce the impact of the handicap. This brain is not able to find a global solution for global problems & dangers.
With growing population the nation states will end consequently. Most of them don't work anyway. The humanity will be at mercy of some globalists, who control all resources and rule as global feudals with absolute power.
Cognitive dissonance in the face of the abyss between one's own worldview and reality!
https://geoarchitektur.blogspot.com/p/cognitive-dissonance-in-face-of-abyss.html
No comments:
Post a Comment